Shady Maple Farms Maple Syrup, Gluten-Free, Grade A Dark, 16.9 oz
Label indicates gluten-free with 100% maple syrup ingredients; no third-party certification evidenced; cross-contact details not disclosed
As an Amazon Associate, Gluto earns from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability may change.
- High customer rating (4.8/5 from 105 reviews) and positive flavor feedback
- Ingredients consist of 100% pure maple syrup
- Gluten-free labeling appears in the listing (dietary tags include glutenfree)
- Several reviews praise flavor/quality and better ingredients than other brands
- No third-party gluten-free certification evidenced in the supplied data
- Packaging size data inconsistency (16.90 oz in title vs 8 oz in specs)
- Price is relatively high for maple syrup
- Cross-contact/facility details not provided
Gluten safety details
Label indicates gluten-free with 100% maple syrup ingredients; no third-party certification evidenced; cross-contact details not disclosed
What to expect
A single-ingredient maple syrup labeled gluten-free with strong taste feedback; available at a premium price; no official third-party gluten-free certification shown in the provided evidence
- Gluten-free maple syrup users seeking a pure maple product with positive taste reviews
- Pancakes, waffles, oatmeal, tea and other breakfast uses
- Shoppers seeking official gluten-free certifications (GFCO/NSF) or dedicated gluten-free facility assurances
- Budget-conscious buyers given the higher listed price
The full guide
Product snapshot
Shady Maple Farms offers a gluten-free labeled maple syrup described as 100% pure maple syrup. The listing shows a high rating (4.8 out of 5 from 105 reviews) and notes the ingredient as a single ingredient: 100% pure maple syrup. The product title indicates Grade A, Dark, and the packaging is described as 16.90 ounces in the title, though some data fields list 8 fluid ounces, which creates a packaging size inconsistency buyers should verify before purchase.
Gluten safety and certifications
The product is labeled gluten-free in the listing, which may be appealing to gluten-sensitive shoppers. However, there is no evidence of third-party gluten-free certifications (such as GFCO or NSF) in the supplied data. Cross-contact or facility details are not disclosed in the provided sources, so buyers should be aware that formal gluten-free assurances outside the listing are not documented here.
Taste, texture, and uses
Customer feedback highlights strong taste and quality, with many reviewers praising flavor and its suitability for various uses (e.g., tea, oatmeal). The product is described as Grade A Dark, which can imply a stronger maple flavor. As a single-ingredient maple syrup, it is suitable for typical maple syrup uses on pancakes, waffles, yogurt, and desserts, though flavor expectations may skew toward a more robust profile due to the Grade A Dark designation.
Pros, cons, and who it’s for
Pros include a high customer rating, a 100% pure maple syrup ingredient list, and gluten-free labeling in the listing. Cons include the lack of third-party gluten-free certification in the supplied data, packaging size inconsistency between the title and specifications, and a relatively high price for maple syrup. It’s well-suited for gluten-free maple syrup seekers who value taste and purity but who may want formal certification or more packaging clarity before purchase.
What shoppers say
💚 People liked
Best tasting maple syrup; great flavor
Ingredients are better than other brands
Popular praise for flavor in multiple uses (tea, oatmeal, etc.)
Some reviewers mention organic labeling in their own comments
⚠ People flagged
No explicit certification details in the listing
High price relative to typical maple syrups
Key takeaways
- This maple syrup is labeled gluten-free and highly rated, but evidence of third-party GF certification is not present in the supplied data.
- Watch for packaging size inconsistencies and verify the actual bottle size before purchase.
Evidence gaps for this product:
- No explicit third-party gluten-free certification visible in the supplied data
- Packaging size consistency not clear between title and specifications
- Lack of detailed cross-contact / facility information from the provided sources